Tunes to download
Forum rules
By using this "Dubs" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Production Forum
By using this "Dubs" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Production Forum
- matt green
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:35 pm
- Location: South London
Tunes to download
Heres some tunes from me and D-Formed. Any feedback welcome, anyone wanting to play these tunes feel free, cheers.
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NW9C9SHE
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NW9C9SHE
- matt green
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:35 pm
- Location: South London
- matt green
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:35 pm
- Location: South London
- matt green
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:35 pm
- Location: South London
noticeable, probably not. but since mp3 is a lossy format (it degrades inquality each time you play the file) those parts that drop lower than 320 in the vbr stream probably would start sounding crummier sooner. just a hypothesis tho...Parson wrote:out of curiosity, is there a real sonic difference between 320 and 320 vbr?
-
ufo over easy
- Posts: 4589
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:27 am
sorry but that sounds like bullshit. There's no way the quality of the file could decrease unless your media player was actually altering the file with every play. If a file's contents doesn't change when it is accessed or opened by a process, then there is no way the quality or anything in that file can change.cringer wrote:noticeable, probably not. but since mp3 is a lossy format (it degrades inquality each time you play the file) those parts that drop lower than 320 in the vbr stream probably would start sounding crummier sooner. just a hypothesis tho...Parson wrote:out of curiosity, is there a real sonic difference between 320 and 320 vbr?
LOL! You are joking right?cringer wrote:noticeable, probably not. but since mp3 is a lossy format (it degrades inquality each time you play the file) those parts that drop lower than 320 in the vbr stream probably would start sounding crummier sooner. just a hypothesis tho...Parson wrote:out of curiosity, is there a real sonic difference between 320 and 320 vbr?
Thanks for the tunes Matt, I'll have to check 'em out tomorrow though.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

