Page 1 of 2
Tunes to download
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:41 am
by matt green
Heres some tunes from me and D-Formed. Any feedback welcome, anyone wanting to play these tunes feel free, cheers.
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=NW9C9SHE
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:00 pm
by cringer
checked these out, nice heavy ones in here. good productions value. loving that running sound, keep it up! i'll drop these for sure.
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:36 pm
by matt green
Cheers mate, anyone wanting 320 MP3s let me know.
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:43 pm
by parson
these tunes are quality!
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:45 pm
by dynamixuk
yar har me heartys dynamix n his cdj's eat 320's. ta for senden em me m8...will be dropin on thursday
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:51 pm
by matt green
If anyone puts these in a mix send a link to it my way, cheers again for positive responses!
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:52 pm
by parson
out of curiosity, is there a real sonic difference between 320 and 320 vbr?
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:54 pm
by matt green
Really wouldn't know mate, seems that 320 is the standard for playing tunes out on MP3.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:44 am
by cringer
Parson wrote:out of curiosity, is there a real sonic difference between 320 and 320 vbr?
noticeable, probably not. but since mp3 is a lossy format (it degrades inquality each time you play the file) those parts that drop lower than 320 in the vbr stream probably would start sounding crummier sooner. just a hypothesis tho...
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:08 am
by parson
sorry i don't believe you lose part of the file every time you play it somebody has been messin with you
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:09 am
by parson
people been calling mp3s dubs for so long they believe it
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:11 am
by doomstep
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:25 am
by ufo over easy
cringer wrote:
but since mp3 is a lossy format (it degrades inquality each time you play the file)
Check wikipedia
Checking the tunes now.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:31 am
by parson
lossy means its not 100% like the source wav not that it degrades progressively when you play it
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:33 am
by parson
but back to matt green
my favs are theory, something for your mind and true lies
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:17 am
by ekaj
cringer wrote:Parson wrote:out of curiosity, is there a real sonic difference between 320 and 320 vbr?
noticeable, probably not. but since mp3 is a lossy format (it degrades inquality each time you play the file) those parts that drop lower than 320 in the vbr stream probably would start sounding crummier sooner. just a hypothesis tho...
sorry but that sounds like bullshit. There's no way the quality of the file could decrease unless your media player was actually altering the file with every play. If a file's contents doesn't change when it is accessed or opened by a process, then there is no way the quality or anything in that file can change.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:19 am
by abZ
cringer wrote:Parson wrote:out of curiosity, is there a real sonic difference between 320 and 320 vbr?
noticeable, probably not. but since mp3 is a lossy format (it degrades inquality each time you play the file) those parts that drop lower than 320 in the vbr stream probably would start sounding crummier sooner. just a hypothesis tho...
LOL! You are joking right?
Thanks for the tunes Matt, I'll have to check 'em out tomorrow though.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:20 am
by ekaj
by the way, you should encode at 320 and not VBR, if you encode straight 320, then the whole file is encoded at 320kbps.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:54 am
by rickydef
yo matt
phat tunes homey..........hhhhheavy
id love to have the 320's if possible?
respect
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:36 am
by ekaj
I like 'Something I want'
