Tips to improve the quality of your tracks in myspace
					Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
	By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- MARCHMELLOW
 - Posts: 979
 - Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:33 pm
 - Location: brighton-uk
 - Contact:
 
Tips to improve the quality of your tracks in myspace
anyone got any good ones at all?
tracks seem ot lose a lot of midrange and high frequency when in myspace, some peeps seems to iliminate this loss really well...but how?
should i just add more in my mixdown, like a special myspace mix down? or will this be pointless?!!
			
			
									
									tracks seem ot lose a lot of midrange and high frequency when in myspace, some peeps seems to iliminate this loss really well...but how?
should i just add more in my mixdown, like a special myspace mix down? or will this be pointless?!!
www.soundcloud.com/marchmellowuk
Dub & Run Records/Phreaks of Nature/Wicky Lindows/BassPunch Records/Tsunami Audio/ Love Sick Records.
						Dub & Run Records/Phreaks of Nature/Wicky Lindows/BassPunch Records/Tsunami Audio/ Love Sick Records.
Re: Tips to improve the quality of your tracks in myspace
yer man i'd also like ot know how some peeps sound goodgaston_UK wrote:anyone got any good ones at all?
tracks seem ot lose a lot of midrange and high frequency when in myspace, some peeps seems to iliminate this loss really well...but how?
should i just add more in my mixdown, like a special myspace mix down? or will this be pointless?!!

http://www.myspace.com/rehabskank
http://www.virb.com/rehab
'Quantech' out now on http://www.addictech.com

- 
				two oh one
 - Posts: 2786
 - Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:30 am
 - Location: Croydon ---> Los Angeles
 - Contact:
 
- MARCHMELLOW
 - Posts: 979
 - Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:33 pm
 - Location: brighton-uk
 - Contact:
 
Even with a clip of a high ( well as high ) quality Mp3, the quality is much lower in myspace then in say- Winamp, or windows media player.Kato! wrote:Mastering, mastering, mastering, mastering!!!!! Oh and mastering! also, only put a clip of the track on, so you can use a higher quality mp3!
i know its not possible to get it sounding identical, but i have specifically noticed some producers seem to get the myspace sound alot better then others, and am just struggling to understand how.
AND i have tried the above technique with a professionally mastered track of mine as well, still have the same issue.
www.soundcloud.com/marchmellowuk
Dub & Run Records/Phreaks of Nature/Wicky Lindows/BassPunch Records/Tsunami Audio/ Love Sick Records.
						Dub & Run Records/Phreaks of Nature/Wicky Lindows/BassPunch Records/Tsunami Audio/ Love Sick Records.
- MARCHMELLOW
 - Posts: 979
 - Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:33 pm
 - Location: brighton-uk
 - Contact:
 
I do and everyone who listens to the tracks should do. The better the quality, the more likely people are to wanna play it out, and eventually sign tracks. its not rocket science to work that out.djake wrote:its only myspace,
who cares what it sounds like
www.soundcloud.com/marchmellowuk
Dub & Run Records/Phreaks of Nature/Wicky Lindows/BassPunch Records/Tsunami Audio/ Love Sick Records.
						Dub & Run Records/Phreaks of Nature/Wicky Lindows/BassPunch Records/Tsunami Audio/ Love Sick Records.
- futures_untold
 - Posts: 4429
 - Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
 - Location: London
 - Contact:
 
Re: Tips to improve the quality of your tracks in myspace
Check this thread...gaston_UK wrote:anyone got any good ones at all?
tracks seem ot lose a lot of midrange and high frequency when in myspace, some peeps seems to iliminate this loss really well...but how?
should i just add more in my mixdown, like a special myspace mix down? or will this be pointless?!!
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=41918
Seems someone else had similar questions recently!
Remember that if you wish to release your tunes, keep your best stuff off myspace or at a low quality so that others can't cheekily skank your stuff!!
- 
				John Locke
 - Posts: 653
 - Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:00 pm
 - Location: Bottle Bong
 
Re: Tips to improve the quality of your tracks in myspace
gaston_UK wrote:Tips to improve the quality of your tracks in myspace...
use virb
yea i have been wondering about this too. some have nailed it with really tight smooth sounding tracks. mine and many others have the occasional glitch in them... dunno if this is down to conversion or streaming limitations. but there must be a way
my best guess is that it comes own to mp3 conversion from various different bitrates to 64. here's hoping some clever bastard reveals their secrets in the thread
			
			
									
									
						my best guess is that it comes own to mp3 conversion from various different bitrates to 64. here's hoping some clever bastard reveals their secrets in the thread
mix better.
ax yourself this:
is it just on myspace
or is it the same when you compare your tracks
in full quality with the desired sounding tracks of your favourite producers
???
im pretty sure most of them dont have a special myspace mastering.
some quotes from 10$bag stolen from other thread
(i think he pretty nailed it):
i take my normal master encode to 320kbps and upload.
thats it.
it sound ok (like a 64kbps crap mp3 could sound)
			
			
									
									
						ax yourself this:
is it just on myspace
or is it the same when you compare your tracks
in full quality with the desired sounding tracks of your favourite producers
???
im pretty sure most of them dont have a special myspace mastering.
some quotes from 10$bag stolen from other thread
(i think he pretty nailed it):
£10 Bag wrote:errrrrr getting a tune to sound good on myspace is no different to getting it sounding good in winamp or on a dubplate.
like cryptic said, it converts them to 64kbps, so experiment with exporting different 64kbps quality mp3 mixes of your tunes, see which one is the best and upload it. this is pretty useless though, don't get distracted by bit rates and so on, if your tune is mixed proper, it will sound proper.
but, like i said, get a good mix and it will sound good in winamp/your car/myspace player/your mum's fanny/underwater/on walkman. there is nothing special about the myspace player except that it lowers the bit rate of your music.
£10 Bag wrote:do people actually do this?CRYPTIC wrote:Dont post good quality tunes on myspace or they will get ripped and looped.
i wouldn't give a shit, if someone wants to rip a 64kbps version of my tune and listen to it, i'll leave them to it, they're obviously pretty fuckin' stupid
i take my normal master encode to 320kbps and upload.
thats it.
it sound ok (like a 64kbps crap mp3 could sound)
- 
				John Locke
 - Posts: 653
 - Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:00 pm
 - Location: Bottle Bong
 
this is not true at all. in fact, the heavier your bass is (or more "airy" your top end is) the more likely yr myspace clips will sound like shit. myspac doesnt seem 2 b able to deal with all the necessary frequencies at once, so it effectively swallows some frequencies up 2 make room.Hugh wrote: generally only tracks with too much going on and poorly produced sounds will sound bad on myspace anyway.
the link i posted earlier is 2 a plug-in that apparently tries to take these problems into account b4 encoding.
tho it aint free, and 2b perfectly honest i aint THAT bothered about myspace
my shit is properly mixed and professionally mastered and it sounds fucking terrible on myspace. and i aint alone in this, seen plenty of v-good producers complaining about the bass overloading everything else or similair problems.
but as some pppl have pointed out above, there's more important things 2 worry about
yeah i'm with earthling on this one. I reckon www.soundcloud.com is the best option. embed their player and you can offer people a download at whatever quality you want and their mp3 encoding seems to sound pretty good.Earthling wrote:EMBED A GOD DAMN 3RD PARTY MEDIA PLAYER IF ITS SUCH A BIG DEAL
Go to my myspace page below and you can see/hear their player.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


