Dubstepforum.com

when the scene starts to get bigger
and the publishers/labels start to clamp down on people sharing their intellectual property??

I'm going to go with 'never'.
Name a single example of labels clamping down on DJ mixes distributed for free, in any genre.

4linehaiku wrote:I'm going to go with 'never'.
Name a single example of labels clamping down on DJ mixes distributed for free, in any genre.

in the rwd forum
you have to wait a certain time before u can upload radio rips.
im sure if i google i will find something.

Marcus Intalex/Soul:r

Anyway, it'll be a while. Won't happen til several years after someone makes enough money to buy a purple lamborghini, lol

subframe wrote:Marcus Intalex/Soul:r

Anyway, it'll be a while. Won't happen til several years after someone makes enough money to buy a purple lamborghini, lol

purple?? sounds like a rare colour

Dub_Warrior wrote: you have to wait a certain time before u can upload radio rips.

Is that regarding Logans show..? I'm sure its to do with the "Listen back" feature .. to boost listeners.. keeping the show on legal radio.

Same goes with Mary Anne Hobbs / Plastician.. Radio 1

subframe wrote:Won't happen til several years after someone makes enough money to buy a purple lamborghini, lol

hahah jokes! surely theres no way to stop them from being distrubuted, sure they proberbly can just about manage to remove them from this forum, but there is always a way!

subframe wrote:Marcus Intalex/Soul:r

What's the story here?

And waiting to upload radio rips to boost listen again ratings is a completly different issue. That's just common curtesy to whoever's show it is, nothing to do with label pressure.

Vonboyage wrote:

Dub_Warrior wrote: you have to wait a certain time before u can upload radio rips.

Is that regarding Logans show..? I'm sure its to do with the "Listen back" feature .. to boost listeners.. keeping the show on legal radio.

Same goes with Mary Anne Hobbs / Plastician.. Radio 1

possibly
i wish there would be more cd's released
there are so many tunes floating around. its vast.
even a cheap album from ukrecordshop. where they help with the costs.
could like 3-5 artists get together and release some mixtapes????

4linehaiku wrote:That's just common curtesy to whoever's show it is, nothing to do with label pressure.

Course..

Dub_Warrior wrote:when the scene starts to get bigger
and the publishers/labels start to clamp down on people sharing their intellectual property??

this thread is exactly how you make things harder for all concerned.

I download and burn mixes for my whip. I put them on my mp3 player and I listen to them at work. I can't be bothered to stream a damn mix when I want to hear it. And I'll post them, here or elsewhere, whether the producers like that or not.

Nobody knows who you are if nobody is playing your tunes. Don't bite the hand that feeds you, I say.

4linehaiku wrote:

subframe wrote:Marcus Intalex/Soul:r

What's the story here?

And waiting to upload radio rips to boost listen again ratings is a completly different issue. That's just common curtesy to whoever's show it is, nothing to do with label pressure.

the problem Marcus mainly had was that someone did an all Soul:R / Revolve:r mix or something and he wasn't too happy about that for some reason ...

gotc wrote:

4linehaiku wrote:

subframe wrote:Marcus Intalex/Soul:r

What's the story here?

And waiting to upload radio rips to boost listen again ratings is a completly different issue. That's just common curtesy to whoever's show it is, nothing to do with label pressure.

the problem Marcus mainly had was that someone did an all Soul:R / Revolve:r mix or something and he wasn't too happy about that for some reason ...

yeah, it woulda been funny if he tried to sue, then someone called him to see all his sample clearances.

Product wrote:yeah, it woulda been funny if he tried to sue, then someone called him to see all his sample clearances.

haha, yea... didn't you know, it's no longer called Drum N Bass--now we call it "Freestyle Break Appropriation"

And on that note, I would like to remind you ALL, it is actually illegal to play records and CD's at a club without a license and WRITTEN PERMISSION of a label involved--for every tune, every time.

That said, I do believe Marcus Intalex is the first(and after the fallout last) producer/owner to say shit about it.

I DARE a label to tell me I can't mix tunes of theirs I bought--they'll be on Soulseek in no time flat.

As it's all good promotion for the tunes I reckon it's pretty fuckwitted to even contemplate it to be honest

jesus.. doom n gloom threads. whas' gwan people ?

4linehaiku wrote:I'm going to go with 'never'.
Name a single example of labels clamping down on DJ mixes distributed for free, in any genre.

dont remember this?
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=16838
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=17016

thc wrote:

4linehaiku wrote:I'm going to go with 'never'.
Name a single example of labels clamping down on DJ mixes distributed for free, in any genre.

dont remember this?
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=16838
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=17016

rofl

drum syndicate wrote:

thc wrote:

4linehaiku wrote:I'm going to go with 'never'.
Name a single example of labels clamping down on DJ mixes distributed for free, in any genre.

dont remember this?
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=16838
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=17016

rofl

sad but true.